Archive for the ‘Education’ Category

Learning Tourism

Sunday, November 13th, 2011

Professor Stephen Heppell has challenged Christchurch to be the first city in the world that is focused on learning tourism. Indeed, where the whole of the Canterbury plains, as a whole system, focuses on learning.

What would learning tourism look like?

Imagine if visitors emerged from the airport to be greeted to the ‘Christchurch campus.’ They might come to jump start their learning. They may have just finished an online degree and just want to have a place to argue about their ideas. Christchurch could be transformed into a place of scholarship and learning, passion and delight – a place where tourists would come to collaborate, engage and immerse themselves in thinking.

In the past, businesses have focused on ‘training’, appointing training managers to develop, induct, supervise and manage employees. This focus is disappearing, to be replaced with the concept of a learning organisation, a knowledge economy and life long learning.

We have the opportunity to attract people who understand the complex nature of the world and want to explore learning in more depth: “They need to learn to cope with the unexpected – and Christchurch is the perfect place.” People could come to learn strategies for coping with change, to explore innovation and to use information communication technologies to stretch their thinking.

Stephen Heppell quotes England as having 2.2 million jobs that are online. One in seven are working from home. In Christchurch, the number working from home, or connecting online, has increased too. The Christchurch Campus could be the heart of online learning and of online working. With ultra fast broad band focused on learning principles we could provide worldwide expertise in the best models of home hubbing, hot desking and digital collaboration. As new spaces are designed we could become world leaders in flexible design for learning organisations.

What would it take?

For Christchurch to be a world leader in learning it would require leaders across the city and beyond to do things from a coherent systems perspective, following agreed principles of learning: learner-focused, future focused, system coherent and sustainable. It would require educators to collaborate for a greater good and to explore new ways of working across networks. “You won’t do it by rebuilding education in the old way.”

Building on Stephen’s ideas, I think there are some opportunities we should consider:

  1. Set up a Young Learner’s Commission. Get a group of young learners to look around the works and intereview people who are already doing great things in learning. This group would be representative of all student groups and develop an initial structure of student researchers who would listen to the voices of their peers. Learning designed by young learners, for young learners, with input from experts.
  2. Run a series of educational events, starting with a conference, forum or TEDx for ideas to be explored and developed.
  3. Establish an independent learning taskforce to work with the Ministry of Education, Christchurch City Council, CERA and government to develop ideas with all stakeholders. Resource this and ensure that all city developments are made with learning in mind.
  4. The Ministry of Education should set up an innovation learning unit that supports schools to try new ideas and make it easy for them to explore ways of working with each other for the benefit of all students. This should be trialled in Christchurch as a demonstration hub.

We could make a start on this before the end of the year. It will take leadership and commitment – I think it is worth it.

“…and in doing so you could rebuild your city, rebuild your future, rebuild your economy and rebuild the excitement and enthusiasm for learning. It’s a no brainer really.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
Share

Shaping Education

Thursday, October 6th, 2011

The Ministry of Education has just launched its website for Shaping Education in Christchurch, New Zealand, following the earthquakes that have devastated the area over the last year. The website is a really positive step, however it does need creative and innovative thinking to lead to the changes needed. So let everyone know that they should have a say and that they should check out the links that are provided on the site.

Over the next few posts, I will be making links to some of the models that might become reality. Some of these ideas link to the Concept Plan developed by our Shaking Up Christchurch Education (SUCE) network. The plan provides one scenario based on the idea of learning hubs, a federated learning model and schools that might specialise and collaborate.

Another model to consider is the Studio School, as explained in a recent TED Talk. Geoff Mulgan describes the work of The Young Foundation, an organisation that melds insights, innovation and entrepreneurship together to explore new possibilities. The question they asked was: ”What kind of schools would teenagers fight to get in to not fight to stay out?” They developed a model of small schools that linked learning to the real world, with students engaged in authentic learning opportunities, and where relationships were key. Doesn’t sound new does it? And of course it’s not but it is not pervasive in education. Should it be? Check out the TED Talk and decide for yourself.

I am interested in Geoff’s final comments about ideas spreading through the use of networks. This is certainly a way in which tribes are grown and ideas are amplified. We should never underestimate the power of networks.

There are other schools that may have some common features. Check out:

What other models have you come across? In what ways do they support learning? Of whom?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
Share

Concept Plan

Sunday, September 18th, 2011

We have just launched a concept plan for the future of ChCh Education. The document, Opportunities and challenges: Creating a compelling vision and direction for education in Christchurch, was to result of a group of us getting together to explore possibilities because we care passionately about education. Language is important and so it is a concept plan rather than the concept plan. Who are we that we should prescribe what should be done? We have an idea and so do lots of others. What we have tried to do in the plan is give people a starting point for conversation. Rather than start from a blank slate we have provided some ideas for people to pull apart and argue about – and in doing so clarify their own thinking.

The Ministry of Education is about to engage in a process of consultation with the Christchurch community and we hope this document will provide a catalyst for action. We have also submitted a response to the Christchurch City Council Draft Plan and will submit some of our thinking to the CERA plan.

Vision is needed. Leadership is needed. Collaboration across the network is needed. Let’s get on with it.

Shaken But Standing

 

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
Share

Survey Update

Sunday, July 31st, 2011

Some of the results from the Shaking Up Christchurch Education survey show a number of emerging themes. We will be using these to continue our conversations about the future education needs of our city. You can still contribute ideas to the survey and pass the link to your networks.

Here are just a few or the common themes:

What should Christchurch Education start doing:

  • Thinking more globally about the city’s education system – more cooperation, consistency and interaction across sectors
  • Being more future focused in its education, using research and examples from other places, with a local flavour
  • Use information communication technologies in a city wide approach

What should Christchurch Education keep doing:

  • Supporting and networking
  • Focusing on student needs and building relationships to support these needs

What should Christchurch Education stop doing?

  • Focusing on what school you went to,  zoning and decile ratings
  • Working for the good of individual institutions rather than the whole community

I think there is a real opportunity for the city to develop its educational vision further rather than leave things to chance. This needs to start with the draft Christchurch City Plan and the opportunities for education in the inner city area. What has been considered for the schools in this area? How can links be grown between CPIT, EPIC and schools? What bus services will be of most use? How can the city regrowth support learning?

 

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
Share

Educational Transformation in Christchurch

Monday, July 18th, 2011

A blogpost by David Duffy, Systems Manager, Think Beyond Ltd

In the late 1990’s the then Minister of Education, Trevor Mallard, took a step towards moving schools into the 21st century by allowing Discovery One School to open in Christchurch. It was, for a conservative Ministry, a bold step and it took many people beyond their comfort zone. Twelve years on the school is well established and the school’s community is enjoying and benefiting from the educational opportunities available in the wider learning environment.

The Canterbury Earthquakes have presented another opportunity for bold leadership in education. The rebuilding of Christchurch has focused on the redevelopment of the central business district, the restoration of the infrastructure serving the city and the relocation and welfare of the people whose homes have been ruined in the series of earthquakes. The Ministry of Education, school boards, principals and their teaching staff have been focusing on the restoration of ‘business as usual’ in the education sector. There have been huge demands placed on the education system at all levels and the fact that schools are functioning so well should be acknowledged and the efforts of all concerned applauded.

However, beyond the need to have schools functioning again is the growing concern for the long term outlook for education for Christchurch, particularly in the eastern suburbs. Schools have suffered in many ways; their communities have been severely dislocated and, in some cases, dismantled and are disappearing; their buildings and campus sites have been badly affected by liquefaction and structural damage; their governing and managing bodies have been stretched to the limit coping with the need to have schools functioning again while coping with their own personal circumstances.

The projected roll outlook for Christchurch indicates that some schools may no longer be economic units and may face closure. An assessment of the pre-earthquake situation reveals that there has always been a number of schools at different levels struggling in Christchurch for a variety of reasons. Throw in the extra dimensions of new housing developments, the relocation of a number of families, and importantly, the growing acknowledgement of the demands of 21st century learning and information technology developments, and there emerges a platform for reassessment about how we do things in Christchurch.

A simple ‘worst-case’ scenario would be for the Ministry to simply close some schools and amalgamate others. Some schools would disappear and some would get bigger but effectively, nothing would have changed and the opportunity for real progress would have been lost.

A ‘best-case’ scenario would see political and personal interests laid aside and a ‘think tank’ of knowledgeable people gather together to present a blueprint for education in Christchurch. They could address the need to educate our children in a seamless system which encompasses health and welfare issues as well being responsible for delivering an appropriate education system for our children as they emerge into the 21st century workforce and life generally. They could address the types of school campuses which would best meet this need by utilising current space and buildings in a more efficient way. This would reduce the need for unproductive competition between schools and ensure that children are coming first in our thoughts. They could address the governance and management systems presently utilised and adapt them so that greater efficiencies become evident which, in turn, would lead to better performance in schools.

They could address the impact of information communication technologies and present ways in which current and future systems can be used for the benefit of pupils and staff. They could communicate with communities who are presently connected with the education system in a remote and/or fractured way and who sometimes feel disenfranchised by the ways we have worked in the past.

They could also explore issues such as middle schooling; kindergartens and primary schools on the same campus site; single sex education in separate schools but with shared infrastructure; and the establishment of learning hubs and resource centres to support the needs of all our children.

Other innovative issues might include flexible enrolments enabling students to pursue studies at other educational facilities, transport networks to facilitate flexibility, and establishing more effective partnerships in the teacher training programmes.

There are examples of such schemes and community projects all over the world. The need for a physical rebuild of our schools in Christchurch has presented us with a unique opportunity to develop some exciting strategies within a responsible fiscal framework. We have the expertise and the knowledge within our community to formulate such plans. The research, the knowledge, the many examples of excellent practice are out there waiting to be tapped into, co-ordinated and manifested into a transformed, modern, effective system.

“Preparing for 21st century learning” has become an outdated catch-cry. We are 11% through this century already. Are the Government and the people of Christchurch going to waste the chance to really seize this opportunity and work collaboratively to prepare an educational environment the people of Christchurch can be proud of? Will be catatonic or catalytic?

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
Share

Leadership for the future of education

Thursday, July 14th, 2011

Slowly a new future for Christchurch is unfolding. Times are difficult. Futures are uncertain. There are still many unanswered questions. What are the implications for our schools? We know that with reduced student numbers there will be a review of the school network, that less teachers will be needed and schools will be faced with some difficult decisions.

Little has been said about the future of education in this city. The Land Report maps carefully show schools sites as ‘white’ meaning that their individual futures have yet to be decided. Given the complexity of the situation this is not surprising. While the Ministry of Education has an important role in the future of our city’s schooling we cannot leave it up to them to provide vision and direction. Our principals are key players in the future of our city. Our community must also play a part. Development of a vibrant, future focused education system must be one of the key strategies for Christchurch – driven by local needs.

Our secondary schools have had the opportunity to share sites, to rethink timetabling structures and to explore other ways of curriculum delivery. While this has been stressful it has also helped school communities to think differently and find ways of making education work. As we move to a new phase of Christchurch’s redevelopment let’s maintain and grow some of these new ideas. As schools move back to their own sites, or to newly established sites, there are opportunities to deliver education more flexibly, to share school expertise, to collaborate and to move learning forward.

Good schools know that it is not wise to build a new building on the school grounds without having a whole school improvement plan in place. It’s not good enough to see a gap and put a new classroom on site just because that is where the gap is. It requires strategic vision for the future and a plan to get there. The plan needs to be flexible and acted on. On a bigger scale this is what must happen across the network of schools if we are to thrive in the future. As the picture for a new Christchurch emerges we must ensure we are future focused in terms of educational possibilities.

Last year Core Education ran a two day workshop Building Future Focused Schools, leading up to the ULearn Conference. Derek Wenmoth and I hosted this workshop, calling on expertise from around the country and the experiences of international experts from the UK and Australia. The workshop themes were vision, planning and governance; pedagogy and space; curriculum infrastructure; and buildings and architecture. There were many key ideas developed during these two days. Some of the ones that stand out for me are the importance of investing in capability development; to think collectively and respectfully; and to develop governance committed to the vision. Above all leadership is key.

One example of leadership that has led to educational transformation comes from Knowsley, not far from Liverpool, England. In 2001 the Knowsley borough decided to transform its model of education, following a review of school provision. Called Future Schooling in Knowsley, this initiative looked at the whole system of education, not just at the individual schools. They aimed to create something much more, where schools were at the heart of the community and where the traditional roles that schools had had with students were redefined.

The new initiative saw eleven secondary schools replaced with seven new Centres of Learning. These centres were community hubs not just new buildings. They offered a more personalised curriculum and explored new models of governance, leadership and management. The New Zealand Curriculum and its partner document Te Marautanga o Aotearoa were developed to be future focused, and lend themselves well to a localised approach. We have opportunities for local government and CERA to take a role in developing a localised approach in our city. The Greater Christchurch Schools Network (GCSN) has already been working to support schools make better use of fast speed broadband for learning. How can we grow a strong network of education in Christchurch?

Everyone will have their view on this. At the end of the day it must be about the collective needs of our city. Learning must be at the centre of all decision making and planning and not everyone will have their needs met. Strong leadership will be needed to drive this forward. Principals are under pressure simply trying to keep their schools running, to deal with traumatised students, teachers, parents and whanau. And a number of them are also trying to cope with their personal griefs, their own red stickered homes and their own family circumstances. We must support them and help guide the future of education.

It is time strong leadership in education to consider next steps. Like many, I have an strong investment in Christchurch. I grew up here and intend to stay here. If we picture the city’s education in ten year’s time we can either look back and think:

  • We shared sites and made some changes to education during the year of the quakes. Now we have less schools but we are all back to doing the same things in the same ways as we were pre-earthquake. OR:
  • The year of the quakes was a catalyst for us to rethink education in Christchurch. We now share expertise across the city and take responsibility for the education of all students across the network. We are looked to as world leaders because we have reduced disparities in education and our students are engaged in learning.

It would be a tragedy if all we thought about was closing schools, downsizing and the doing the same things we have always done in education. What if we explored new possibilities and used these difficult times to create a new and vibrant education for our city?

We have decided to take a proactive stance by providing the opportunity for others to share their ideas and suggest possibilities. If you are interested in transforming Christchurch education fill out our survey Shaking Up Christchurch Education and pass it on to others who you think might be interested.

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
Share

Do something impossible

Friday, July 8th, 2011

I recently read a post called about challenging doubters to do something impossible. It commented that when people say “This is impossible” there is a great opportunity to figure out how it could be possible. My good friend David Anderson would probably respond by asking the question, “If it was possible, what would it look like?” I can think back to a number of occasions where people have said things such as, “What has this got to do with education?” and  ”I tried that…it didn’t work…” These have been really useful comments for me because in both cases I have personally reflected on “What if…” and believe I have come up with some good stuff! I have tried to make connections and explore possibilities.

My latest thinking revolves around the impact that the Christchurch earthquakes have had on our local education system. What if we took looked at this as an opportunity to grow a new vision for education in Christchurch? What are the possibilities? How can we take the best of what we already have and create something that is world class, and considers the needs of all students?

 


Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
Share

Leading community engagement

Tuesday, April 26th, 2011

Leading involves listening and exploring possibilities before making decisions. While they may be decisive, they also realise the importance of engagement. I really like the model shown below, developed by the council of the City of Charles Sturt, as I think it shows the many facets of interacting with the community. Leaders need to understand that engagement is not simply working at informing and consulting. To only work at this level is not to engage but to believe you know it all and so only need to check in for affirmation or fine detail. Where leaders understand the many facets of engagement they are able to articulate the level they are working at, who will make the final decision and how the voices of others will be heard and valued.

I would suggest that this model can be adapted for educational leadership, especially to encourage student voice. Schools often focus on informing and discussing, thinking that discussing = consulting. Yet this is just the start, often being implemented when ideas are well developed. The second stage of consultation sees stakeholders involved in dialogue during the early stages of planning and having a role during the whole process even if they do not make the final decision. Less often, schools focus on students as equal partners, with decisions being made together. And still less frequently are students entrusted to initiate and manage their own work.

All these levels of engagement are appropriate. When students (and other stakeholder in all settings) have opportunities to be partners in decision making there is a greater chance of commitment and increased opportunities to make decisions for oneself. This is the fine balance between structure and freedom.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
Share

Future focussed teachers

Friday, March 25th, 2011

I came across this video of teachers providing their vision of 21st century teachers. Eighteen classroom teachers speak out on technology integration in response to two videos that have been around for a while  A vision for students of today and more particularly A Vision of K-12 students today. I have several quick comments:

  1. There are teachers who understand that technology is a tool to do things in more powerful ways; that the technology really can be used to collaborate, connect, challenge, and engage.
  2. There are other teachers who have a fixed mindset and are not yet open to possibilities.
  3. Leadership of schools has an important role to play in developing a growth mindset amongst staff. Principals and other leaders must continually focus on a co-created vision for the future and relentlessly pursue it. See principal Carolyn Stuart’s guest blogpost providing an example of how this is done – on purpose.
  4. Unless we do something to improve the quality of teacher training things will change slowly. Old models exist of patch protection, overblown bureaucracy slowing pace of change and lecturers modelling what not to do. In some cases training institutions have limited technological resources and staff are still using overhead projectors to deliver courses.  How will this prepare teachers for the future? Yes, I know there are places that are doing some good things, but I see limited future-focused teacher training here in New Zealand, or further afield. If it happens it is through good luck rather than good planning and vision across the whole organisation.
  5. If you have any models of teacher training that are really pushing forward I want to know!! Am I missing something? Join the conversation at ALPinE Leadership if you have ideas and visit our Answergarden on Teacher Training.

So watch the video. It is worth thinking about what you are doing to lead future focused change in education.

And here is my final comment:

We need to get over the talk about 21st century…

We are over a decade into it. Aren’t we there yet?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
Share

Christchurch earthquake, influence and social networking

Wednesday, March 16th, 2011

A month ago Christchurch was decimated by yet another earthquake. Since then many new online initiatives, discussions and reports have appeared using a range of social networking and web 2.0 tools. The power of social networking has driven some interesting dialogue! Over the next few months this will continue, morph and intensify as we rebuild Christchurch City.

So in the Storify below I have taken snippets of the journey to date. Social networks enable more power to our people than ever before. As a company that focuses on leadership for the future, we understand that leadership is not about power but about influence. In today’s world we all have the opportunity to influence the future as never before.

This archive of social networking conversations takes snippets from a variety of social networks and Storify helps bring these together easily. The snippets include information about the earthquake, its effect on education, its effect on businesses, and on the lives of us all. They are stories of corage, hope and possibilities.

You will see a “load more” message at the bottom – click it! There are several pages of enlightening material, resources and links. It’s worth it….

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
Share