Teaching is Dead

Teaching is Dead

Teaching is dead in its current format. It’s not doable. It requires people who can juggle so many balls in the air that most of them fall to the ground. It’s even too hard to focus on a few critical balls. So why do we persist with this used future? What’s the story of educational inertia? Why aren’t teachers falling in love with teaching? Are learners really at the centre?

Yesterday I had the privilege of working with the leadership teams of four amazing schools (three primary and one special school) and over the course of the morning we built on their expertise in leadership, which is already considerable.

As the conversations developed we recorded layers of ideas to form a futures triangle. It seems appropriate to share this since in Aotearoa New Zealand all our secondary teachers are on strike for better pay and conditions. But better pay and conditions aren’t the real issue. I’d like to share the triangle with you to provide a glimpse into the wider problem.

The Push of the Present

We started with a fun competition focused on jotting down all the initiatives, curriculum changes, governance reviews and legislation connected with their day to day work. You can see the brainstorm on the bottom left hand corner of the image below. It shows so many balls in the air that it’s impossible to keep up. We talked about the interconnectedness of some of the initiatives but even so you’d give yourself a repetitive strain injury if you tried to juggle even half these balls!

We didn’t explore all the pushes of the present. We could have added considerably to the balls if we had explored technological, social, environmental, economic and political changes. However, the conversation was cathartic and led to some excellent debriefs about what was important to create the biggest positive impact on learners.

The Weights of the Past

We didn’t spend time on the weights of the past, but acknowledged the importance of Te Tiriti ō Waitangi in all that we do, the future focused nature of NZ Curriculum and Te Marautanga o Aotearoa and the impact of Tomorrow’s Schools legislation 1989. It is important to realise that weights are not negative (although they can be!) but they do underpin and influence the work of today. Also note that throughout the diagram school context features as a key element. The history, the place, the connections with people and the community are critically important. They also add complexity that is unique to each school.

The Pull of the Future

Again, this wasn’t our main focus for this particular workshop but we did take a glimpse into the world of 2043 and what we might see or hope for. We considered the changes in our population, the role of climate change and technology.

The Space of Hope

I have added a new dimension to the Futures Triangle, which I have labelled the Space of Hope. This was an important focus of the conversation as we explored the things we could change or influence. Given the overwhelm within the sector it was important for leaders to consider their role in designing the balls to be focused on. You will see that there is a lot that can be influenced. This led to a great discussion about the world of possibilities and the practical actions that leaders could be, and are, taking. This space of hope draws on the circle of influence work below. One of the reasons I like this as an addition to the Futures Wheel is that it provides a wide view of the system and how the parts influence and interact with each other. I could talk all day about that!

Yes but…

While the main focus was to help these leaders consider their spaces of hope I look at the triangle and see that that hope is being dragged down, in fact squashed, by the push of the present. It means that the focus is generally on ‘no change’ (ie surviving the barrage of balls) or ‘minor change’ (rearranging the balls you juggle). The pull towards the future is overwhelmed so there is little room for adaptive change (changing the balls for pins), let alone transformational change (doing away with the juggler). And so we continue to work in a used future full of disheartened jugglers and leaders who are ringmasters of the old style circus.

The pull towards the future is overwhelmed so there is little room for adaptive change (changing the balls for pins), let alone transformational change (doing away with the juggler). And so we continue to work in a used future full of disheartened jugglers and leaders who are ringmasters of the old style circus.

So what?

Teaching is dead – one possibility. There are many other possible futures that can be explored and many positive examples in practice.  Yet the signals below are not so positive:

  • it is increasingly hard to recruit teachers
  • less people want to be principals or school leaders
  • teachers are leaving the profession
  • wellbeing, life balance and feeling valued are major issues
  • schools are overwhelmed with change that comes from siloes of government
  • leadership growth is poorly managed as a system
  • learners needs are increasingly diverse creating a huge weight for schools
  • community expectations and increasing polarisation add to the load

There are some amazing educators in our schools so this isn’t knocking the profession and I do want to acknowledge the leaders that I have the privilege of working with – they are stunning. But there are huge pressures on schools and the people within them. The siloed nature of government means that bureaucrats create change without talking to each other or considering the whole system. When new governments are elected the pendulum swings. Leading up to elections we have political soundbites explaining how education will be fixed. A back to basics swing when the world is changing so rapidly? We agree that our young people are not learning and thriving as we want them to. Thinking that a technical response will ‘fix it’ is naive and unintelligent. Education is complex. Schools are complex. We can’t keep adding to the workload, tinkering with approaches or throwing more balls into the mix.

It’s time for politicians in Aotearoa New Zealand to create a bipartisan agreement about the purpose of education and what principles will lead us forward. Without this the space of hope will be swamped and you won’t find great teachers or school leaders wanting to stay in the profession. Then technology really will be the way that education is transformed. One of many possible futures but is it one we prefer?


17 Comments
32
Robin Sutton · March 29, 2023

Abso-blooming-lutely nailed it Cheryl. Ka mau te wehi, e hoa!!! I will share this with our team!!!

Reply
    32
    Cheryl Doig · March 30, 2023

    Thanks Robin. It is interesting to explore how the three parts of the triangle interact as a way of exploring the system.

    Reply
32
Lee Parkinson · March 29, 2023

Great points well made Cheryl, and while teachers are expected to take on the additional roles of unpaid social workers and child minders for parents and caregivers, for the privileged or disadvantaged, this will only get worse. Teachers need space and time to do what they do best – teach and cause learning to occur. I am not a teacher, but I am a Grandfather of 5 girls and 1 boy, and I am deeply concerned for their, and their contemporary, futures.

Reply
    32
    Cheryl Doig · March 30, 2023

    Thanks Lee. That’s why the work you and I are doing in the futures space is so important. There are many possible futures but if we keep trying to tinker the future could send us backwards. Let’s talk more about growing futures literacy!

    Reply
32
Kim Alexander · March 29, 2023

Spot on Cheryl! Thank you for your thinking and mahi. Insights in this article are huge. I will be sharing with my SLT.

Reply
    32
    Cheryl Doig · March 30, 2023

    Appreciate your comments Kim. It’s important to explore the system and multiple futures. While I appreciate the work that teachers and school leaders do I think we are just trying to add more to a model that has passed its use by date. That is why hope is important and focusing on the critical few things that make the difference for ākonga to thrive in the future. It is still the same system though….

    Reply
32
Tam · March 29, 2023

Fantastic article, the image of the futures triangle is a powerful visual of the complexities

Reply
    32
    Cheryl Doig · March 30, 2023

    I love the futures triangle as you know Tam! It really does provide a view of the complexities. There is a whole lot to unpack that I didn’t even mention.

    Reply
32
Mark Maddren · March 30, 2023

These thoughts about these exact concepts you have written about are bouncing around in my head. Robin Sutton has written in the past about creativity, and In the Early World by Elwyn Richardson, I have been thinking about how we can return to simpler times. How do we, as leaders, filter some of this “stuff” to protect our teachers and give them space to teach and time to enjoy it? How can we use our circle of influence to simplify our teachers’ lives? Lots of questions. However, no answers yet. Thank you for your thoughts. They certainly helped my thinking.

Reply
    32
    Cheryl Doig · March 30, 2023

    Robin is an exquisite example of a principal who is a servant leader and who has worked tirelessly and successfully to make a difference. I think creativity is a key but the push of the present can be overwhelming which is why hope is important and focus must be relentlessly about ākonga thriving for their future not our past. We can keep focused but the system is weighing us down in the most bleak of scenarios. There are other possibilities and so it is critical to use our influence to challenge the status quo.

    Reply
32
Rob Warner · April 5, 2023

Some good provocations here…I wonder how we could increase our ‘map granularity’ for the NZ teaching domain, and its numerous entanglements with other socially constructed systems…a temporal lens is a useful start (past/present/futures)…yet what are the constraints (enabling/governing/rigid/elastic/dark/tethers etc) that might shape adjacent possibles? Where might be the zone of possibility for safe-to-try probes and experiments? How to triangulate ambition/agency/affordances to unlock the evolutionary potential of that system…side casting into the now (in addition to future backwards)…this map will no doubt be enriched through diversity of perspectives…the craft of teaching practitioners and professionals, the art of the possible, the science of contemporary education theory and policy…

Reply
    32
    Cheryl Doig · April 5, 2023

    Thanks Rob. I think there are multiple possibilities in your ideas. Lets’ organise a chat to explore the deeper connections and possibilities. There is a workshop in the making here! And definitely the opportunity for you to write a guest blogpost.

    Reply
32
lisa heald · April 9, 2023

Your work is a “space of hope”. There needs to be a movement of transformational schools with leaders who have the capacity and capability to create this momentum so others can see the future.
Being unable to find this ‘space of hope’ in my leadership journey I resigned at the end of last year. The racism, sexism and lack of progressive decision making in my colleagues wore me down and I realized I was no longer working from my values . After 25 years I am about to apply for a weekend job at a mushroom farm because I would rather work there. So the profession is losing some of it’s best leaders. Those of us who can transform schools are being killed off.

Reply
    32
    Cheryl Doig · April 9, 2023

    Oh Lisa I am so sad you have been lost to the profession but not surprised. Hope is critical to keep the flame alive. I wonder what might be next for you as you have so much talent to share. I’d love to hear more of your journey over a coffee.

    Reply
32
Linda Tame · April 11, 2023

Great thinking as always, Cheryl ! I am about to have a term’s sabbbatical (lucky me),.. and this is a great frame to begin it with.

Reply
    32
    Cheryl Doig · April 11, 2023

    Thanks Linda. It is interesting to me that we only touched a slice of pushes of the present in this workshop. In this state we can manage some adaptive change but little that is transformative. Principals can wish for better work conditions and a pay rise but the system is no longer fit for purpose. Teachers and principals will go down with the ship, propping up the system right until their last breath but is that acceptable?

    Reply
32
Linda Tame · April 12, 2023

Kia ora Cheryl

Not me calling for better conditions and pay.

I have found it far more difficult trying to be even slightly transformative the last few years for a combination of reasons.

Read some interesting papers from Aus about inequity there recently. Unsurpisingly same problems diffferent context.

Ngā mihi

Reply

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *